INTEGRATING ETHICAL AI IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: A PATHWAY TO ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/der.2024.art338506Ключові слова:
ethical AI, public administration, transparency, accountability, Sustainable Development GoalsАнотація
This research explores the transformative potential of ethical artificial intelligence (AI) in public administration to improve services, increase transparency, and promote social equity while aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Key ethical principles such as transparency, accountability, fairness, inclusivity, and privacy are essential for trustworthy AI deployment in government. Ethical AI can support SDGs by reducing inequalities (SDG 10), enhancing justice and institutional trust (SDG 16), and fostering sustainable innovation (SDG 9). Challenges include lack of universal ethical standards, resource constraints, data privacy concerns, and biases embedded in historical data. To address these, the article recommends developing comprehensive ethics guidelines, promoting interagency collaboration, investing in AI education, engaging diverse stakeholders, and implementing accountability mechanisms. The integration of ethical AI in public administration offers a pathway toward inclusive, transparent governance and sustainable development, provided that ethical considerations guide its adoption and use.
Посилання
- Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149–159.
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature News, 538(7625), 311.
- Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
- Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 1–15.
- Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.
- O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
- Perga, I. (2024). The role of AI (large language models) in managerial decision-making: Benefits and challenges. Наукові перспективи, 10(52), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2024-10(52)-32-49
- Richardson, R., Schultz, J. M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty data, bad predictions: How civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. NYU Law Review Online, 94, 192–233.
- Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., … & Schwartz, O. (2018). AI now report 2018. AI Now Institute at New York University.
